Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Magali Kempen vs Carolina Kuhl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kempen vs Kuhl analysis and find out who is favored!
Magali Kempen vs Carolina Kuhl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kempen 1 - 0 Kuhl
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kempen has won 47.21% of points on their second serve, while Kuhl has won 46.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kempen, in recent form, has won 53.93% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kuhl has won 61.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.38% and 43.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kempen has saved 47.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kuhl has saved 46.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kempen has won 50% of matches played (W/L 18/ 18), with Kuhl winning 58.33% (W/L 35/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kempen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 51/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Kuhl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 13/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Kempen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 18/ 15), where as Kuhl has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 21/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kempen winning 1 times and Kuhl being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kempen winning 2 and Kuhl winning 1. The last match between Kempen and Kuhl was at the W50 Edgbaston, 06-02-2024, First, I.hard with Magali Kempen getting the victory 6-0 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kempen and Kuhl have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kempen winning 1 times and Kuhl 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kempen winning 0, and Kuhl 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kempen has played against opponents with an average rank of 305 while Kuhl has played against players with an average rank of 306.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kempen has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kuhl has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kempen has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kuhl has converted 56.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
462
Rank
191
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
504
Rank
396
High
19
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
63% (257-150)
Career Total W/L
60% (59-40)
71% (15-6)
YTD W/L
58% (21-15)
$2,000
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Magali Kempen | Carolina Kuhl |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:0 | 2:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 80% (55/69) | 78% (77/99) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (43/55) | 58% (45/77) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (5/14) | 50% (11/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (43/99) | 30% (21/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Magali Kempen
Player
Carolina Kuhl
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve %
78%
(
77 of
99)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Magali Kempen | Carolina Kuhl |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (15/6) | 58% (21/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (34/17) | 59% (47/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (267/199) | 56% (396/313) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 78% (14/4) | 59% (10/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 85 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 96 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:34 | 1:42:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 301.71 | 273.61 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (897/1347) | 63% (1425/2273) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (625/897) | 61% (874/1425) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (212/450) | 46% (391/848) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (86/193) | 57% (176/311) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (673/1512) | 50% (1144/2305) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (15/6) | 52% (12/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (9/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (15/21) | 60% (21/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 17% (1/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 83% (23/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 17% (23/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 15% (13/2) |
Magali Kempen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Magali Kempen
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Magali Kempen
37%
(
22 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Magali Kempen
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Georgia Pedone
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Pemra Ozgen
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aravane Rezai
Player
Magali Kempen
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
2
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Pemra Ozgen
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oceane Dodin
Player
Magali Kempen
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
13
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
0-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Carolina Kuhl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Carolina Kuhl
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Carolina Kuhl
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Anali Kocevar
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
44%
(
27 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
45 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Melisa Ercan
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Carolina Kuhl
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Angelica Raggi
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Alessandra Mazzola
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
49 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
40 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Viola Turini
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Kempen Vs Kuhl Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kempen are available here and Kuhl photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Carolina Kuhl
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
